Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rigele Te vs Ji Sung Nam Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Te vs Nam analysis and find out who is favored!
Rigele Te vs Ji Sung Nam Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Te 1 - 0 Nam
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Te has won 50.34% of points on their second serve, while Nam has won 45.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Te, in recent form, has won 48.16% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nam has won 49.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.05% and 32.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Te has saved 60.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nam has saved 52.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Te has won 56.76% of matches played (W/L 21/ 16), with Nam winning 48.28% (W/L 14/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Te has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 122/ 97), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3). Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 232/ 169), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Te has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.89% of matches (W/L 7/ 11), where as Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 13/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Te winning 1 times and Nam being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Te winning 2 and Nam winning 0. The last match between Te and Nam was at the China F10 (Shenzhen), 13-07-2018, Quarterfinals, Hard with Rigele Te getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Te and Nam have played a deciding set 0 times, with Te winning 0 times and Nam 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Te winning 0, and Nam 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Te has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.7 while Nam has played against players with an average rank of 309.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Te has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nam has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Te has converted 56.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nam has converted 40.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
493
Rank
395
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
663
Rank
236
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
55% (169-137)
Career Total W/L
56% (279-215)
60% (9-6)
YTD W/L
45% (5-6)
$980
Career Prize Money
$1,445
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Rigele Te vs Ji Sung Nam For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Te VS Nam
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Rigele Te | Ji Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:0 | 1:27:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (34/60) | 73% (53/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 91% (31/34) | 62% (33/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (13/26) | 55% (11/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (29/73) | 27% (16/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Rigele Te
Player
Ji Sung Nam
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rigele Te | Ji Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (9/6) | 45% (5/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (20/16) | 42% (11/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (180/159) | 47% (113/130) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.65 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 108 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 41 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:11 | 1:39:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 368.93 | 184.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (581/1022) | 59% (446/761) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (428/581) | 68% (305/446) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (222/441) | 46% (144/315) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (38/67) | 40% (31/77) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (354/949) | 39% (310/795) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (3/4) | 50% (4/4) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (9/15) | 45% (5/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 25% (8/2) |
Rigele Te Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Ye Cong Mo
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
15
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Chase Ferguson
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
100%
(
24 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
14 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Qiulin Wang
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Rigele Te
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
11
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
59%
(
70 of
118)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
112)
13
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
39 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(7) 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Rigele Te
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
10
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Rigele Te
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
8
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ji Sung Nam
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Kaito Uesugi
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Yunseong Chung
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Shintaro Imai
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ji Sung Nam
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
122)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
112
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Te Vs Nam Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Te are available here and Nam photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
